--> Skip to main content



Vivekachudamani Verse 7: Wealth Is Not the Ticket to Liberation

Vivekachudamani Verse 7 – Money Cannot Buy You Bliss Or Moksha  - Gold Plated Hanuman Chalisa Will Not Buy You Moksha

Vivekachudamani verse 7 is very clear. There is no hope of immortality by means of riches. This is the declaration of the Vedas. So work done only for getting rich cannot be the cause of liberation. Simple, no confusion, no commentary needed. Still, we manage to confuse ourselves.

Then what gives liberation? Yajnavalkya answers this in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, chapter 2, section 4. He tells his wife Maitreyi that he is leaving household life. He offers to divide his property between her and his other wife Katyayani. Maitreyi asks one question: "If the whole earth filled with wealth were mine, would I become immortal?" Yajnavalkya says no, your life will be like the life of rich people, and there is no hope of immortality through wealth - renunciation alone can make her immortal (Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 2.4.2). Maitreyi replies that she has no use for what cannot make her immortal (2.4.3). A woman who politely refuses a full share of the property, thousands of years before any inheritance court case. We can learn from her.

The same idea comes again in the line that says: not by rituals, not by children, not by riches, but by renunciation alone some attained immortality. Note the word "some". Even renunciation is not a shortcut for people who only look good in saffron.

The Gold Plated Donation Circus

Today we read news about devotees donating gold plated Hanuman Chalisa, gold plates, diamond rings and bags of cash to temples. The announcement comes first, then the photo, then the donor name on a marble slab. Some people think they are bribing Bhagavan, like a small file needs a small envelope to move faster. Some people get a nice ego boost. Some sincerely believe this is spirituality, giving gold to a temple whose treasury is already overflowing and counted by machines.

The poor are also not far behind. They bring their simple offering, a coconut, a few flowers, a small coin, also hoping to get Bhagavan's attention. Here the intention is at least honest. But let us be fair, the ego boost is same, only the budget is different.

Meanwhile Bhagavan is busy elsewhere giving a helping hand. Somewhere a couple is planting fruit trees whose shade and fruit they will never enjoy, only for the next generation. That is real offering, and nobody is announcing it on a microphone.

Bhagavan Himself has told us what He accepts. In the Bhagavad Gita, chapter 9, verse 26, Sri Krishna says whoever offers Him a leaf, a flower, a fruit or water with devotion, He accepts it. A leaf. Not a gold leaf, just a leaf. The word that matters is devotion, not the price tag. Even the story of Sudama, who brought a handful of beaten rice to Krishna, tells the same thing (Bhagavata Purana, Book 10, chapter 81). Krishna ate that poha with more joy than any royal feast.

The King, the Cart Puller and the Naked Sadhu

Wealth creation was meant for food, clothing and shelter. Society forces us to earn for these basics, and nothing wrong in that. But today wealth is created for everything else, and a small part of it goes to a rich temple with the best possible publicity. If that money went to the old, broken, forgotten temple in your own neighbourhood, where the roof leaks and one priest waits for oil for the lamp, it would do far more good.

History has a sense of humor about this. The king with all his treasure could not buy liberation, but the poor cart puller who did not even have an upper garment got it. Alexander the Great conquered half the known world and could not get it, but the naked sadhu with no possession, taking his sunbath on the river bank, had it already. Alexander had an army, the sadhu had a towel he did not even use.

The Katha Upanishad says the same in a different way. When Yama offers Nachiketa wealth, long life and kingdoms, the boy refuses and says a man cannot be satisfied by wealth (Katha Upanishad 1.1.27). A small boy could see what many grown men with big bank accounts cannot.

Symbolism and Meaning of Renunciation

Renunciation does not mean everybody should leave the house and go to the Himalayas. Then who will pay the electricity bill? It means letting go of the feeling of "I am the doer" and "this is mine". The Ishavasya Upanishad, in its first verse, says everything in this world is pervaded by the Divine, so enjoy through renunciation and do not covet anyone's wealth. So a person can even live in a big house, if the house does not live in him.

Wealth itself is not a sin. Lakshmi is worshipped in every Hindu home. But she is worshipped as a guest and not as a prisoner. When we lock her in the cupboard and sit on her, she becomes a burden and not a blessing.

Life Lessons and Modern Day Relevance

The lessons are simple. Earn honestly, keep what you need, share what you can without a camera, and do not think that a big donation gives you a special queue in front of Bhagavan. He has no VIP darshan.

In the modern world people work for fifteen hours to buy a bigger house, then a bigger car, then a bigger temple donation to feel clean about all that work. The mind is never satisfied. More money only creates more fear of losing it. The liberation the Vedas talk about needs none of this.

The Real Point

Liberation is within you. See it in yourself, and then see the same in all living and non living things around you. The Self that sits inside you is the same in the beggar, the king, the tree and the stone. Nobody needs to buy something that is already there. There is no need for any wealth circus.

🐄Test Your Knowledge

🧠 Quick Quiz: Hindu Blog

🚩Hanuman met this beautiful nymph during the search for Mata Sita

  • A. Kattu Neeli
  • B. Swayamprabha
  • C. Maneka
  • D. Thilothama



🕉️Contents To Explore

Show more