--> Skip to main content



Why Kerala Has No Shakti Peeth Despite Its Strong Shakti Worship

 Why None of the 51 Shakti Peeths Are in Kerala - A Different Path of Devi Worship

Shakti Peeths are spread across Bharatavarsha, from the northwest to the north, west, east and central parts. The most popular list has 51 Peeths. There is also a list of 108 Sidh Peeths and another of 18 Ashtadasha Shaktipeeths. Some of them are in Andhra Pradesh also. But a question comes to many devotees. Kerala has one of the oldest and strongest traditions of Shakti worship in India, and Devi is worshipped as Bhadrakali in almost every part of the state. Still, not a single one of the 51 Peeths is found there. Why is it so?

The Story Behind the Shakti Peeths

The Peeth tradition comes from the Puranic account of Sati. When Sati gave up her body in the yajna of her father Daksha, Shiva carried her body in grief. Bhagavan Vishnu then used his Sudarshana Chakra and the body parts fell at different places. Each place became a Shakti Peeth. So the whole idea of the Peeths is rooted in the Puranas, especially the Devi Bhagavata Purana and the Kalika Purana. A region where the Puranic stories did not travel much would naturally not become part of this list.

Reasons Why Kerala Is Not in the List

  • Bhadrakali worship in Kerala is based on the Darika Vadha, the killing of the asura Darika, and not on the story of Sati or Mahishasura. It is an independent line of worship.
  • Shakti in Kerala comes directly from nature worship. The Devi is seen as the power of the land, the forest and the village itself.
  • The coastal areas of Kerala followed a different style of worship in which Tantra was dominant.
  • The Shaiva and Shakta Puranas had little or no influence in ancient Kerala, though the worship traces its roots to Tantra.
  • Kerala’s concept of Shakti is closely connected with Tantric practice and less with Puranic stories.
  • The geography of Kerala, with the Western Ghats on one side and the sea on the other, limited contact with Puranic Hinduism.
  • Puranic teachers were less adventurous in travelling to such regions, but Tantra teachers were adventurous and found ways to reach Kerala and exchange ideas.

Darika Vadha and Bhadrakali

According to the Devi Mahatmya tradition and the later Kerala accounts, Darika was an asura who became very powerful and troubled the devas and the people. Shiva created Bhadrakali from his anger to destroy him. In Kerala this story is told in songs and rituals like Mudiyettu and Theyyam, which are still performed today. This shows how the worship lives in the daily life of the people and not only in temples. The Mahishasura story, which is told widely in north and east India and is the base of Durga Puja, is not the central story here.

Tantra and the Philosophy of Shakti

In Hindu philosophy, Shakti is not a separate being outside Brahman. Shakti is the power of Brahman itself. The Shvetashvatara Upanishad (Chapter 4, Verse 10) says that Maya is Prakriti and the one who controls Maya is Maheshvara. This means that power and the Supreme cannot be divided. Tantra puts this idea into practice through direct sadhana, mantra and yantra. Because of this, Kerala devotees did not need a Peeth story to feel the presence of Devi. For them she was already present in the soil, in the village and in the kavu, the sacred grove.

Kerala's Unique Temple System

Kerala's temple system is a major reason why 51 Shaktipeeths went missing here. Instead of depending on scriptures, Kerala’s Shakti worship is rooted in crude nature – the deity first worshipped by man in the forest followed him to his agriculture field and later into his home and temples. In fact almost all the Kerala Shakti temples are based on accidently finding a murti in nature or arrived with a devotee in his olakkuda or umbrella from Kodungallur. 

Kerala developed a very distinctive ritual and architectural culture. Its temple tantra was highly systematized, and this affected how deities were installed and worshipped. The fact that Kerala had its own highly developed ritual institutions may actually help explain why its Goddess traditions didn't need to express their sacred legitimacy through the North Indian/ pan-Indian Shakti Peetha framework.

Kerala’s Own Sacred Centres

Though Kerala has no Peeth from the 51, it has many powerful Devi temples. Kodungallur Bhagavathy Temple, Chottanikkara, Attukal etc are examples. Kodungallur is considered by many as the most important Bhadrakali centre. In fact her presence can be felt in several other Shakti temples in Kerala. Many believe that Tantric worship has been followed here from very old times. So the absence of a Peeth does not mean the absence of Shakti. It only means a different tradition, with a different history.

Influence of a Far Ancient Culture

Tamilakam had an independent tradition of Goddess worship. Ancient Kerala cannot really be studied in isolation from the wider Tamil cultural world. The Korravai/Kottravai-type warrior/mother-goddess traditions of ancient South India are relevant background for understanding the later South Indian forms of Durga/Kali/Bhagavati. The cultural boundary between ancient Kerala and Tamilakam was also very different from the modern Kerala–Tamil Nadu boundary.

The list of Peeths is one way of understanding Devi in Bharatavarsha, and it comes from the Puranic tradition. Kerala followed another way, which is older in many respects, more local and more Tantric. Both ways lead to the same truth, that Shakti is one and is worshipped in many forms. Kerala’s example shows how Hinduism is not one single stream but many streams that meet in the same ocean.

🐄Test Your Knowledge

🧠 Quick Quiz: Hindu Blog

🚩This Mahabharata Warrior Returned To Earth To Perform Food Charity During Mahalaya Pitru Paksha

  • A. Karna
  • B. Arjuna
  • C. Bhima
  • D. Abhimanyu



🕉️Contents To Explore

Show more