--> Skip to main content


Bahutattvavada

Bahutattvavada is a doctrine which maintains the plurality of objects as real as against the monistic view that reality is one. Such a pluralistic realism is held by many schools of thought in Hinduism. In fact, except Advaita which maintains absolute monism, all other schools of philosophy adopt pluralistic realism in one form or the other.

Madhva holds an uncompromising pluralism (dvaita) declaring that all differences are real. For example

  1. Physical objects are different from one another
  2. Physical objects are different from the selves
  3. Selves are different from one another
  4. The soul is different from God
  5. God is different from everything else

Madhavacharya goes to the extreme and declares that even the released selves differ in their experience as the delights of deliverance.

Ramanujacharya does loosen this rigorous pluralism of Madhavacharya by holding that reality exhibits not only differences but also an identity running in and through them. For example, Brahman in his system is not a bare non-dual identity as in Advaita of Adi Shankaracharya. He is qualified (visishta) inseparably and organically by the twin attirbutes (visheshana) of selves ont eh one hand, and matter on the other. Hence his system is called Visishta-Advaita, or qualified non-dualism.

Yet Ramanuja asserts that each self and every material object is real. In other words, the self, either in bondage or in release, does not lose its individual identity. The plurality of selves and matter is real though they are the inseparable aspects of God. Nevertheless, God permeates everyone of them and lends them an identity in, and through, their differences. Thus, Ramanujacharya prefers an identity-difference rather than a bare monism or a bare pluralism.

Many other Vedantic philosophers like Nimbarka, Vallabha, Bhaskara, Srikantha, and Chaitanya follow, in one form or another, the pattern of Sri Ramanujacharya. Even Kashmir Shaivism or Shaivasiddhanta are plainly pluralistic.

The other philosophies not based on the Vedic text but on reasoning like Nyaya, Vaiseshika, Samkhya and Yoga, believe the reality of the plurality of categories. For example, the Nyaya School accepts seven categories such as substance, quality, action, inherent relation, generality, particularity and non-existence as fundamental and real.

The Vaiseshika admits atoms as ultimate particles. To both Nyaya and Vaiseshika, each and every self is independently real. Samkhya and Yoga say that each and every self is real, though the physical objects owe their being to homogeneous matter. The Vedic school of Mimamsa, too, adopts this pluralistic realism both as regards material objects and the selves.

Among the heterodox systems, all the school of Buddhism and Jainism admit plurality of selves and objects. Thus Hindu thought falls basically into two types of doctrines – monism or non-dualism and pluralism, qualified or unqualified.

Earlier

A Comparison Between Mohini Avatar of Vishnu and the Scandinavian God Thor Taking Woman Form