--> Skip to main content


Difference In The Teachings Of Lahiri Mahasaya And Paramahansa Yogananda

By

Lahiri Mahasaya (1828-1895) and Paramahansa Yogananda (1893-1952) are pivotal figures in the Kriya Yoga tradition, yet their teachings and approaches have distinct differences reflective of their unique missions and contexts. Here’s an overview of their teachings and key differences:

Lahiri Mahasaya

  1. Focus on Individual Spirituality:

    • Emphasized personal practice and direct experience of divine states through Kriya Yoga.
    • Taught that spiritual progress is an individual journey requiring self-discipline and daily practice.

  2. Integration with Daily Life:

    • Stressed that spirituality should be integrated with everyday life, encouraging practitioners to maintain their worldly responsibilities while engaging in spiritual practices.

  3. Direct Transmission and Oral Teaching:

    • Preferred direct, oral transmission of teachings and techniques to students.
    • Less emphasis on written works; most of his teachings were passed down through his disciples and their notes.

  4. Universal Approach:

    • Welcomed students from all walks of life, regardless of caste, creed, or religion.
    • His approach was non-sectarian, focusing purely on spiritual practices rather than religious doctrines.

Paramahansa Yogananda

  1. Global Mission:

    • Aimed to spread the teachings of Kriya Yoga globally, particularly in the West.
    • Founded the Self-Realization Fellowship (SRF) to disseminate his teachings and establish a worldwide spiritual community.

  2. Written Works and Autobiography:

    • Authored several books, most notably "Autobiography of a Yogi," which introduced many Westerners to Eastern spiritual practices and philosophies.
    • Emphasized the importance of scriptural study alongside meditation.

  3. Structured Lessons and Organization:

    • Developed a series of structured lessons for students to follow, ensuring a systematic approach to learning Kriya Yoga.
    • Focused on creating an organization (SRF) that could provide guidance, support, and a sense of community to practitioners.

  4. Harmonizing Science and Spirituality:

    • Attempted to bridge the gap between science and spirituality, presenting Kriya Yoga as a scientific technique for spiritual development.
    • His teachings often highlighted the compatibility of modern scientific discoveries with ancient spiritual truths.

  5. Inclusivity and Adaptation:

    • Adapted his teachings to suit the needs of a Western audience, making them more accessible without compromising their essence.
    • Promoted the idea that spiritual truths are universal