Hindu Woman Denied Abortion in Catholic Ireland Dies


Savita Halappanavar, 31, a Hindu woman, admitted to University Hospital Galway in the west of Ireland, died of septicaemia a week after miscarrying 17 weeks into her pregnancy. She was denied a life saving abortion by Catholic Ireland – Irish abortion laws denied a termination because Catholic Church is against Abortion

No words can console the irreplaceable loss of Savita Halappanavar. Let she attain Moksha and never suffer in this ignorant world.

Death of Savita Halappanavar is nothing but a cold blooded murder of a human being who could have been easily saved. It does not matter whether the woman is Catholic or Hindu. It is pure commonsense that prime importance should be given to the life of the mother - she might have other children / she can in future give birth to more healthy children. Those responsible should be tried for murder. Government of India should make sure that those responsible for the death of Savita Halappanavar are punished and the victim’s family is given justice.

Secondly, as the death of Savita Halappanavar happened because of a religious rule – How can catholic rules be applied on a Hindu woman? When Savita Halappanavar pleaded that she was not a Catholic – why was she denied the life saving abortion.

This incident once again proves that minority religious fundamentalists decide the fate of innocent people in all religions. And the so called secular and educated people support such rules. Sri Krishna says to Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita that there is nothing worse that not performing one's Dharma. The duty of the doctors is to save lives not follow dictates of fundamentalists.

It is also encouraging to see that large protests are taking place in Ireland against this monstrosity.
The Hindu reports “In an attempt to save a 4-month-old foetus they killed my 30-year-old daughter. How is that fair you tell me?” A. Mahadevi, Halappanavar’s mother, told several Indian television stations. 
“How many more cases will there be? The rules should be changed as per the requirement of Hindus. We are Hindus, not Christians,” she said. 
Savita Halappanavar’s father, Andanappa Yalagi, said the combination of medical negligence and Irish abortion laws led to his daughter’s death.

Halappanavar, a 31-year-old dentist, repeatedly asked staff at University Hospital Galway in western Ireland to terminate her pregnancy because she had severe back pain and was miscarrying, her family said. 
But they replied she could not have an abortion because Ireland was a Catholic country and the foetus was still alive, her husband Praveen told the Irish Times. 
"Savita was really in agony. She was very upset, but she accepted she was losing the baby," the 34-year-old told the newspaper by telephone from the Karnataka region of southern India.
"When the consultant came on the ward rounds on Monday morning Savita asked if they could not save the baby, could they induce to end the pregnancy.
"The consultant said, 'As long as there is a foetal heartbeat we can't do anything.'

"Again on Tuesday morning, the ward rounds and the same discussion. The consultant said it was the law, that this is a Catholic country.

"Savita said: 'I am neither Irish nor Catholic' but they said there was nothing they could do."

Halappanavar died of septicaemia, or blood poisoning, on October 28, a week after she was admitted. The foetus had been removed on October 23 after its heartbeat stopped.


7 comments:

Anonymous said...

The death of Mrs Savita Halappanavar was unfortunate; however, it is equally unfortunate to demand that the laws of another country should be changed to suit Hindus. Ireland is country with a majority of Catholics. They have every right to decide on the laws of that country. Mrs Savita Halappanavar’s father, Andanappa Yalagi, seems to be more balanced, finding that the combination of medical negligence and Irish abortion laws led to his daughter’s death. Terming the death as a cold-blooded murder will not bring the lady back; only enrage religious intolerance further. Instead let us pray for the departed soul!

Anonymous said...

though my heart goes to the parents of savita. I am also thinking about the doctors. its not easy killing a living foetus! what would we have done if we were the.doctors. in india itself thousands of unborn are killed for money because they happen to be girls. atleast in west, they have some respect for life. people looking for justice ahould stay in india and try getting it, good.luck. no need to say any further.

Anonymous said...

Also, let us not give an impression of selectively quoting from Bhadvat Gita to suit one's arguments. Lord Krishna emphasises one’s duty. But doesn’t he also say (ch.2, v.11) that the knowledgeable does not mourn the dead or rejoice the living? The doctors seemed to have done their duty within the constraints of the law of that land. Mind you, they can not play God in any case. Had the will of God be otherwise, the lady would have survived. Let us not rake unnecessary controversy, however grief-stricken one is, that too on the religious grounds. May the departed soul be in peace and time console the family.

Sabitha said...

To the above comment...

Stop talking nonsense. You are using Gita to suit your arguments. 'No mourning' is understanding the invincibility of soul....

If your relative is in a pool of blood on the road after accident and you see him will you say ...knowledgeable does not mourn the dead or rejoice the living or move him to hospital.

The duty of the doctor is to save the life of people. Duty of Arjuna as a warrior is to protect Dharma. This is what Krishna was trying to teach.

The doctors failed to do their duty.

Anonymous said...

As you can see Ms Sabita, Mr Abhilash Rajendran has understood the comments in the intended context. When taken in the totality of things (Lessons Uddhava Gita, 17 Nov 2012), you too can understand the futility of blaming the doctors. If not, one can only wish that you come out of your 'dream state' sooner. Cheers.

Farouk Gulsara said...

To err is human. Laws are enacted for smooth running of any society. hence, one should not demand change just to satisfy individual need. when you embrace a society, you also embrace their cultures and laws. God is omnipotent!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous accept the fact that you would be the same person fighting for the lady had she been your sister/wife. Is not it? It hurts when it is on to you and your family. It does not matter whether she is a Hindu or a Christian. She should have been saved. It is foolish to end 2 lives when you could have saved one. Laws are made for the betterment of humans and not for the destruction. Instead of consoling her death, you could have smiled for some one surviving this tragedy. Do not blindly support things which are not justified. God has given you brains , use that.

Post a Comment

All comments are moderated and will appear only after approval. If you like to contact me - hindublog@gmail.com.